National Aeronautics and Space Administration Logo
Follow this link to skip to the main content NASA Banner
Solar System Exploration
Orbital History
Objectives  |  Tempel 1  |  Why Study Comets?  |  Cratering  |  Observations  |  Comets in Ancient Cultures 
Creating Colorful Comets  |  Science Team  |  Spectroscopy  |  Publications  |  Small Bodies Missions 

Science - Tempel 1 - The Plan

The Comet | The Discoverer | Orbital History | Rotation
Where is Tempel 1 Now?


The Orbital History of Comet 9P/Tempel 1

The outgassing activity of periodic comets, and hence their observability, depends upon how close these icy bodies approach the sun. The following table shows the evolution of the comet's perihelion distance and orbital period as a result of various passages by Jupiter for a few hundred years in the past and future. From the 17th century until the comet's discovery, repeated passages by Jupiter reduced the comet's perihelion passage distance to a point where the comet's activity allowed it to be discovered in April 1867.

Comet 9P/Tempel 1 was the first discovery of a periodic comet by Ernst Wilhelm Leberecht Tempel and the 9th periodic comet to be recognized as such. After its discovery in 1867, the comet was observed during its next two returns to perihelion in 1873 and 1879. However a close Jupiter approach in 1881 to within 0.55 AU pushed the comet's perihelion passage distance out to 2.1 AU so that despite attempts to recover the comet, it was not seen again for nearly a century. As a result of additional Jupiter approaches in 1941 and 1953, the perihelion distance evolved back in toward the Earth's orbit and the comet was again observed during its 1967, 1972, 1978, 1983, 1989, 1994 and 2000 returns to perihelion. Between 2000 and 3000, the comet's perihelion passage distance will reach a minimum of 1.48 AU in 2161 and a maximum of 2.37 AU in 2833. Because the orbital period of comet 9P/Tempel 1 is roughly one half that of Jupiter, the comet's orbit is in a so-called 2:1 resonance with Jupiter and hence its motion is rather stable, without wide variations in its orbital evolution. In the following Table, the comet's perihelion distance and orbital period are given for times on either side of each Jupiter close approach. This Table is meant to show the evolution of Tempel 1's perihelion distances and how they can change as a result of Jupiter close approaches. While there are no Jupiter close approaches within the interval, information is also provided for the returns to perihelion between 1967 and 2022.

Time Epoch Perihelion Distance (AU) Orbital Period (years) Jupiter Close Approach Distance (AU)
1643 Nov. 4.39 25.1  
1644 Sept.     0.019
1648 June 2.86 7.77  
1664 Jan. 2.86 7.77  
1668 Aug.     0.776
1671 July 2.51 7.16  
1700 Mar. 2.51 7.16  
1703 Nov.     0.202
1707 Jan. 1.86 6.19  
1771 July 2.00 6.46  
1775 July     0.653
1777 Nov. 1.76 5.49  
1783 Nov. 1.76 6.02  
1787 Mar.     0.349
1789 Nov. 1.59 5.70  
1867 May 1.56 5.65 Comet discovery in 1867
1870 Feb.     0.359
1873 May 1.77 5.98  
1879 May 1.77 5.98  
1881 Oct.     0.553
1885 Sept. 2.07 6.50  
1937 Dec. 2.07 6.50  
1941 Oct.     0.415
1944 May 1.69 5.84  
1950 Mar. 1.69 5.84  
1953 Sept.     0.750
1955 Dec. 1.53 5.55  
1967 Jan. 1.50 5.51  
1972 July 1.50 5.50  
1978 Jan. 1.50 5.50  
1983 July 1.49 5.49  
1989 Jan. 1.50 5.50  
1994 July 1.49 5.50  
2000 Jan. 1.50 5.51  
2005 July 1.51 5.51  
2011 Jan. 1.51 5.52  
2016 Aug. 1.54 5.58  
2022 Mar. 1.54 5.58  
2024 May     0.551
2028 Feb. 1.77 6.00  
2034 Feb. 1.77 6.00  
2036 Apr.     0.911
2040 May 1.93 6.29  
2116 May 1.90 6.23  
2119 Nov.     0.497
2122 July 1.61 5.76  

The Minimal Effect of the Deep Impact Impactor on the Orbital Motion of Comet 9P/Tempel 1

The collision with comet 9P/Tempel 1 takes place near the comet's perihelion point and at a relative velocity of 10.2 km/s. The 370 kg impactor will impart a very modest 0.0001 mm/s velocity change in the comet's orbital motion and by so doing decrease the comet's perihelion distance by 10 meters and decrease its orbital period by far less than a second of time. This is to be compared to a change of some 378 billion meters in the comet's perihelion distance due to the passage by Jupiter in 2024. Because the comet is so much larger and more massive than the impactor, there will be practically no change in the comet's orbital motion as a result of the Deep Impact collision. As is evident from the above Table, the changes imparted in the motion of comet Tempel 1 by Deep Impact are completely negligible when compared to the orbital changes on the comet due to periodic passages near the giant planet Jupiter.

It has been suggested that one effective technique for deflecting a small comet or asteroid that is on an Earth threatening trajectory would be to run into it with a massive spacecraft at high velocity several years prior to its predicted Earth encounter. The optimal technique for this type of kinetic energy impact would involve a head on crash of a massive spacecraft with the comet at the comet's perihelion to cause it to lose a bit of its orbital energy and hence change its orbital velocity by a few millimeters per second. Over ten years' time, a 7 mm/s change in the comet's velocity would modify its orbital position by one Earth radius thus allowing the comet to miss the Earth entirely. Although, the impulse given to comet 9P/Tempel 1 in 2005 will not materially affect this comet's orbit, this same impact magnitude could substantially affect the trajectory of a much smaller comet. For example, it is interesting to note that the impulse delivered to comet Tempel 1 in 2005 would be sufficient to move, in ten years time, a comet of diameter 125 meters by one Earth radius.

Content Copyright by Don Yeomans


The Comet | The Discoverer | Orbital History | Rotation
Where is Tempel 1 Now?

Awards and Recognition   Solar System Exploration Roadmap   Contact Us   Site Map   Print This Page
NASA Official: Kristen Erickson
Advisory: Dr. James Green, Director of Planetary Science
Outreach Manager: Alice Wessen
Curator/Editor: Phil Davis
Science Writer: Autumn Burdick
Producer: Greg Baerg
Webmaster: David Martin
> NASA Science Mission Directorate
> Budgets, Strategic Plans and Accountability Reports
> Equal Employment Opportunity Data
   Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act
> Information-Dissemination Policies and Inventories
> Freedom of Information Act
> Privacy Policy & Important Notices
> Inspector General Hotline
> Office of the Inspector General
> NASA Communications Policy
> USA.gov
> ExpectMore.gov
> NASA Advisory Council
> Open Government at NASA
Last Updated: 28 Jun 2010